首页> 外文OA文献 >Towards understanding healthcare professionals’ adoption and use of technologies in clinical practice: using Qmethodology and models of technology acceptance
【2h】

Towards understanding healthcare professionals’ adoption and use of technologies in clinical practice: using Qmethodology and models of technology acceptance

机译:旨在了解医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中对技术的采用和使用:使用Q方法论和技术接受模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Globally, technologies have been recognised to improve productivity across different areas of practice including healthcare. This has been achieved by the expansion of computers and other forms of information technologies (IT). Despite this advancement, there have also been growing challenges to the adoption and use of these technologies within practice sometimes with unintended or unexpected consequences. However, the barriers and drivers to IT, and more specifically e-health adoption within healthcare are little understood, especially in areas such as Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where e-health adoption is relatively new. \udMethodology: This paper describes a pilot study to develop and validate sample statements for use within a later substantive Q-methodology study. The aim of the main study was to understand factors that influence healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) attitudes towards IT adoption and use in SSA. We report on the use of this methodology to explore the subjectivity of HCPs together with the models of technology acceptance (Technology-Acceptance-Model: TAM and the Unified-Theory-of-Acceptance-and-Use-of-Technology: UTUAT) used in combination for the first time. \udResults: Following various stages and mapping of the two models of technology acceptance used, forty-six statements were developed at the end of the pilot study. These statements were grouped into six themes to capture the constructs of the two models used in the study.\udConclusion: Findings suggest it is possible to use TAM and UTAUT to develop a comprehensive set of statements. These statements reflect choices that HCPs consider on IT/e-health adoption and use in SSA which can be used in a Q study. \udKeywords: E-health, Q-methodology, Healthcare professionals, Technology Acceptance Model, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, Sub-Saharan Africa.
机译:背景:在全球范围内,已公认技术可提高包括医疗保健在内的不同实践领域的生产率。这是通过扩展计算机和其他形式的信息技术(IT)来实现的。尽管取得了这种进步,但在实践中采用和使用这些技术也面临着越来越多的挑战,有时会带来意想不到的或意想不到的后果。但是,人们很少了解IT的障碍和驱动因素,尤其是医疗保健中采用电子医疗的原因,尤其是在诸如撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)等电子医疗采用相对较新的地区。 \ udMethodology:本文描述了一项初步研究,以开发和验证样本陈述,以供以后的实质性Q方法研究使用。主要研究的目的是了解影响医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对SSA中IT采用和使用的态度的因素。我们报告了使用这种方法来探索HCP的主观性以及所使用的技术接受模型(技术接受模型:TAM和技术接受和使用统一理论:UTUAT)首次组合。 \ ud结果:在各个阶段以及对所使用的两种技术接受模型的映射之后,在试验研究结束时制定了46条陈述。这些陈述分为六个主题,以捕捉研究中使用的两种模型的构造。\ ud结论:研究结果表明,可以使用TAM和UTAUT来开发一套综合的陈述。这些陈述反映了HCP考虑的关于在SSA中采用IT / e-health并在QSA中使用的选择。关键字:电子医疗,Q方法,医疗保健专业人员,技术接受模型,技术的接受与使用统一理论,撒哈拉以南非洲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号